User avatar
Martin Escardo @MartinEscardo@mathstodon.xyz
11mo
Academics, including myself, should create an equivalent of the arxiv for git.

I am not sure how long it will take, but gihub will certainly go the google+ and jamboard way, by discontinuing things that are no longer interesting or profitable to Microsoft (or, even worse, acceptable by whatever US administration decides to pressure Microsoft).

While there are already alternatives, I don't (at least not yet) trust any of them.

We need something made by academics for academics, just like the arxiv, where there is some hope of long-term persistence.

For example, I care about the future of TypeTopology, even after I die, but there is no hope for this in the hands of Microsoft, or any alternative I have seen.
13
0
1
0
User avatar
Yannick Forster @yforster@types.pl
11mo
@MartinEscardo not git as such, but software heritage and zenodo allow saving releases of github repositories
1
0
0
0
User avatar
Martin Escardo @MartinEscardo@mathstodon.xyz
11mo
@yforster And what are their promises regarding the future, compared to the arxiv?
2
0
0
0
User avatar
Yannick Forster @yforster@types.pl
11mo
@MartinEscardo www.softwareheritage.org "we are building the universal software archive" it's by academics, without looking deeper I'd say it's on the same level of guarantee as arxiv, and has ambitions to have even higher guarantees
2
0
0
0
User avatar
mio @mio@shrimp.mio19.uk
11mo
@yforster @MartinEscardo I was thinking about this problem: For archiving purposes source code might not be enough. Some software needs binary version of itself to compile. bootstrappable.org
0
0
1
0